Blogs - Read Life Stories From Fellow Members - NewbieNudes

User not found

This user could not be found. They may have deleted their account.

Joined
Last login
View full profile

User not found

This user could not be found. They may have deleted their account.

age
NN Network:  
Heterosexual
Lesbian
Gay
TV / TG / CD
Live Cams
Free photo hosting
view:    desktop  |  mobile
Username:
Password:
remember me?
 Latest:
View All  |  Update Your Status
Help / Support | Settings | View or Edit your profile
premium

View Blog Comments
Blog Title: Bunnylovescake
Others Have Said: 
Bunnylovescake
12-Jun-13 19:28:51
Yes I'm 19 :D
12-Jun-13 19:42:04
good job NN and glad you got that cleared up... it would suck to lose a contributing member just because some people do not like them...
12-Jun-13 19:42:37
Closer to 20 than 19
12-Jun-13 19:45:02
A job well done NN!
12-Jun-13 19:48:28
First, I would like to thank you for checking on this. It was the proper thing to do.

Now. What persecution? NN, I can assure you that a plethora of members had asked her to tone it down a bit in regards to her actions and they way she conveys being under age. If she was chastised it was because she brought it on herself by pushing an agenda that most find offensive. You say she is an adult, well good. Hopefully she will start acting like one. Her simulation of xxxxxxxxxx is disgusting and I for one blocked her when she returned (again) and will leave her on block.

As for persecution? I will still make jokes, as I do with others. I make jokes about a member who constantly pimps his VG, I make jokes about betty being a goofball, I make jokes about guitar and his wood, I make jokes about Big making fun of me. I could name more, but you get my point.

Bunny is not off limits to me with my jokes and the balloons. It isn't considered persecution. I joke about a ton of things. And if someone doesn't have a sense of humour, then oh well.

Again, her age was part of the question the other was the "act"

thank you for asking her to tone it down. You tell us all to act like adults, maybe she will listen.
12-Jun-13 19:51:06
Maybe persecution wasn't the right word.
redvs4u
12-Jun-13 19:52:16
As far as I know her age was not in question only the ridiculous pre school behavior. And it is not about being everyone's cup of tea....there are lots of things on here that are not attractive to me but I just overlook them and say "whatever floats your boat". But I do think that acting like a child should not be tolerated in this setting and that is what I believe most people to exception to.And to say that she was persecuted is ridiculous. If a person is so thin skinned that they cannot deal with the fact that not everyone likes them then they do not need to be on a site like this. And for the record I have nothing against this member personally I do however, take great umbrage to the acting like a 6 year old on an adult site.And I do not foresee her toning anything down a notch so I will be using my blocking option.
12-Jun-13 19:55:23
twl joking about someone you openly show a dislike for, feels less like a joke and more like an attack. and just because I know someone will say that it is just banter, banter goes both ways it is not just one or two people taking jabs at someone they dislike...
12-Jun-13 20:04:58
Toy, I can say that I have never been mean in a cruel way. When this poster returned, she and I said openly in status that I would still joke about the balloons and her reply was that she would still go on ignoring me even if they were jokes. I am open about everything I kid about....always open. She has me on block and I have her on block. That is between the two of us. It is our understanding. It seems to work for us. I get your point, Toy. I do. But this was discussed in an open forum between me and her. I think my reputation as NOT being intentionally cruel is perfectly safe.
12-Jun-13 20:06:41
NN, I was wondering about that word........lol.
bettysswollocks
12-Jun-13 20:08:19
And I give TWL and Red a round of applause for stating their position much better than I could.

Thank you as well NN for responding to the item that was raised in your recent meeting. Thank you also for recognising that "persecution" was the wrong word.
12-Jun-13 20:10:52
maybe not you twl, but those that say she is acting childish then copy her status updates word for word, cross the line in my opinion, and need to take reds advice and block her rather then perpetuating something they say they do not like... it is like people who taunt the racist troll when he is around, then complain about how he acts...
SarahAnn69
12-Jun-13 20:17:10
Thanks for addressing this. Was starting to feel very like a PR disaster for kiddie pics.
12-Jun-13 20:25:16
*just reads*...
12-Jun-13 20:26:04
Thank you NN for going the extra mile to try and resolve this. TWL has got it right, not about age, but about content. I was in status the day the 2 of them"talked"it out.... I find it offensive how bunny goes the extra mile to make it sound like she is in grade school.... Then all these older men trip over their tongues to lap it up...... Thank you TWL for saying what I would have found more difficult to say and thank you NN for your efforts!!
Research Candidate
12-Jun-13 20:28:38
You came into status tonight offering a 2 for 1 deal on premium membership but you got no takers...do you wonder why? I'm happy to support an adult site (where adults act like adults), but not one where adults are free to act in such a way that mimics what I might see on a CBBC childrens television programme.

The childish act is still ongoing...
@amps aww *Bunny gives you a big sugar cookie that looks like a Barbie*
@Big sis *cuddles with you in a pool of chocolate*
Aussie_Couple
12-Jun-13 20:30:09
Ridiculous per school behaviour ?, I've seen per school behaviours from so call adults on here well over the age of 45 years old, taking snide comments about mods and throwing dummy spits when one was muted..
Anyway good to see this issue is finished with..

Mr A_C
Aussie_Couple
12-Jun-13 20:31:34
Behaviour *
12-Jun-13 20:42:49
you told someone who was informed on NNs offer to wait for something better RC, how can you act like someone who care about people becoming premium when you discouraged it?
12-Jun-13 20:50:14
I was doing some analysis recently... There was a sudden drop in our sales that started around the same time we launched status.. I am certain we have lost a lot of long standing loyal premium members over this infighting.
Research Candidate
12-Jun-13 20:54:03
Was it because of the introduction of status, or because of the way status is moderated?
SarahAnn69
12-Jun-13 20:55:25
I'm new here but status is good enough, but some of the stuff that's let go on it, mostly this BS, is sickening.
12-Jun-13 20:55:44
NN, the forum fights are just as ridiculous. I don't think one is worse than the other. I would say they are even with one another in regards to the fighting.

12-Jun-13 20:56:25
actually NN it is too bad you started asking why premium members want to leave when you did and not earlier. also maybe asking non premium members why when they delete might be an idea to figure out why you are losing member. it is not uncommon for companies to contact former customers to do exit surveys to better analyze customer service needs...
12-Jun-13 20:56:51
SarahAnn69 - the infigthing or bunny's role play
MieleGattina-OLD
12-Jun-13 20:59:33
I was just about to say exactly what tighty said...the only place on the site that doesn't have that infighting is the chat room, and that's because hardly anyone uses it anymore. It's the internet, this stuff exists on every social site. There is nothing you can do to make everyone happy here. I just wish people would ignore what they don't like (unless it breaks the rules) and focus on what they do like, instead of constantly trying to make it perfect for them.
SarahAnn69
12-Jun-13 20:59:50
The creepy role play, its actually really disturbing to watch.
12-Jun-13 21:01:03
me too MieleGattina
12-Jun-13 21:02:42
Re: the role play - I have asked blc to tone it down. If she doesn't then maybe I have recourse. At the moment - she is abiding by the rules.
12-Jun-13 21:07:29
It is obvious that this is am issue that many feel is worth talking about...the many responses to this blog in a very short time prove that. Mg is right, in a perfect world.
12-Jun-13 21:09:11
Well it looks like one issue addressed. Another tone down request submitted. I guess it will be left to see how the request is followed. I don't know that I would have couched it as a request, but it's not my call. So good on ya for making a call.
If one has a role play fetish, particularly one leaning toward illegal, then it may be better carried out in private. Not the same thing at all, but if acting out unsavory fetish in public forum is ok then there are some very unsavory ones I don't care to see. It would be a shame to have them broadcast. It's your thing do what you want to do. However, I have no interest in watching a woman pretend to be pig in some twisted farm fetish. Again not the same thing at all, but dangerous thin grey line to walk. Again thanks for addressing concerns.
MieleGattina-OLD
12-Jun-13 21:12:03
NN, she never broke the rules. Not once. The act makes people uncomfortable, that's where the problem lies. When the average member spends time here, the last thing they want to think about is childlike behavior...and, bear in mind, childlike is different from immature. I don't like it, and I've made that clear, but I just leave it be, because she is technically not breaking any rules. Everyone here has a choice on how they behave and react...nothing anyone can do to change that.
MrCoverYou
12-Jun-13 21:13:44
There has been no toning down thus far.
12-Jun-13 21:14:54
Nope there hasn't.
Research Candidate
12-Jun-13 21:16:22
Exactly as I said above MrCoverYou. No toning down whatsoever.
12-Jun-13 21:16:52
Seriously NN I hope this role play is "toned down" more than a "notch". If someone was going on about xxxx role play they would not be tolerated. Yet this stuff appears at the top of every single page on the site. It doesn't surprise me people are leaving they are most likely concerned about being caught in some xxxxxxxxxx ring when all they want to do is have a bit of a perv.
Research Candidate
12-Jun-13 21:20:55
Juicy, you make a valid point, it's a shame that some people here cannot see that, despite it being mentioned countless times.
SarahAnn69
12-Jun-13 21:21:27
I appreciate the effort NN,

In the long run, this may be a case of making new rules, like how SuicideGirls doesn't approve of posing with stuffed animals because it promotes kiddie pics.

From the advertising standpoint, you're dealing with what at a glance looks like a PR disaster for an illegal fetish. Not something people want to be associated with.

Some cans of soup say 'open can and dump soup into pot' because someone had to address the fact that someone else was dumb enough to put the whole can in it.
Bunnylovescake
12-Jun-13 21:24:04
NN I think persecution is the right word. And bullying would be better.
Whispermyname
12-Jun-13 21:24:50
I have her blocked as she has me it was discussed between us via pm in a very mature way. There was never a question of her age. I dare to say she does it because she is a shit stirrer and enjoys the hype and attention she is getting.
Bunnylovescake
12-Jun-13 21:26:15
I'm not the only girl on here who takes pics wearing school girl outfits, stuffed animals, tutus etc
SarahAnn69
12-Jun-13 21:27:16
But Bunny, it's ALL you do. And you use terminology that ensures you're taken as an innocent unexperienced child.
12-Jun-13 21:27:22
hell i take pictures with stuffed animals and dressed as a school girl, and dodoo does them wearing a tutu...
Bunnylovescake
12-Jun-13 21:27:41
I hope you have a nice day NN thank you :)
Research Candidate
12-Jun-13 21:28:52
Whisper, we can all block her should we choose to, but like I said in the town meeting and others agreed, "should that kind of behaviour be tolerated on an adult site?" Age verification is not enough.
12-Jun-13 21:29:49
to the people who want to act like she should be gone. what gives you the damn right? i dislike half of the people who commented on this status and i dont openly take shots at them, if they want me to i can start because that is how i see the people treating bunny.
12-Jun-13 21:33:03
MG is right. She is not breaking the rules, but that doesn't mean the actions and simulations of KP won't come back to bite the site on the ass.
12-Jun-13 21:34:54
sarah when did suicide girls do that, at one point it was a regular theme as is school girl, GIRL being the operative word. also remember that as said before by many blocking what you do not like is the simplest answer for those who do not like her act. and as I have said before if most those who say the way she is acting is wrong were to be told the same of how they behave, they would response with they can enjoy themselves however they want and everyone needs to get a sense of humor. well it works both ways, if you can enjoy yourself how you want why cant she enjoy herself how she wants?
Aussie_Couple
12-Jun-13 21:35:03
Enjoys the hype and attention, nothing wrong with that, if that's what's she likes then so be it, you can't dictate what she or how she has to act as long as it is with in the rules..


Mr A_C
Whispermyname
12-Jun-13 21:35:25
No RC not at all but I did a little research myself the other day and actually spoke to a couple of members on here about it. They agreed and I agree she is or was when I was watching annoying. I actually talked to a friend of mine the other day about joining the site. I didn't sign on ..not thinking...and showed them what I enjoy most...status. At that time she was on...my friend was WTF? Are you serious? I thought you said it was an adult site...No thanks he said
12-Jun-13 21:35:44
so true TWL, it's the perception
12-Jun-13 21:37:54
Toy, that is sooooooooooooo totally different and cannot compare to the ongoing visual from a person who is promoting acts of an unsavory nature that could ultimately get NN into trouble. Role play now and then for a fetish is different. Hell, every now and then I have done the school girl college thing too. But I don't promote it as a child. Joking around in a blog like doo did is also different.
freekforpussy
12-Jun-13 21:39:37
an interestng read , TWL sums it up nicely ,
I blocked bunny some time ago , which partially works , it would be nice if the block was total , the blogs as well .

Thank you for posting this blog NN

12-Jun-13 21:43:12
It all boils down to this:
NN has asked her to tone it down.
He will be watching the actions.
He knows how this reflects the site.
He knows the ramifications of how this can bite the site in the ass.
Lastly, NN knows there is a border that should not be crossed or else it is bye bye NN.


Whispermyname
12-Jun-13 21:47:53
We'll see Tighty because what I'm reading by these members is that it hasn't happened yet
12-Jun-13 21:48:24
^5 yes indeed
12-Jun-13 21:51:32
it is no different TWL not when by blocking her you all can live in peace...
12-Jun-13 21:55:36
you know what here is something to think about, it is you who see her this way, she has never claimed to be under age...
Research Candidate
12-Jun-13 21:57:26
I guess ignorance is bliss...
12-Jun-13 21:58:30
toy you are totally missing the point as I see it. EVERYONE who pervs on this site is being exposed to childish and childlike behaviour. I think it is safe to say the vast majority do NOT come here for that kind of thing but when it is constantly in status and allowed to be there it is front and centre on every single page of this site. To say it is a turn off is a huge understatement especially when this place is already a guilty pleasure for so many to add an element of illegal increases the guilt and decreases the pleasure meaning people just won't come back nor will they support the site financially.
12-Jun-13 22:00:42
juicy and those that mock her are just as bad, plain and simple... if people do not like it they can block her and live happily ever after never having to see her... but rather then that people spend hours, days, weeks, bitching about her
MrCoverYou
12-Jun-13 22:03:00
Toy, I don't know what horse you have in this race but you couldn't possibly be missing the point more than you are.
Research Candidate
12-Jun-13 22:04:56
People are discussing it for the good of the site, unfortunately you toy, seem to have a blinkered view on everything and everyone that does not agree with you.
Viszla1
12-Jun-13 22:05:14
MR NN this is rediculas on belief....just saying reading and digesting... your intelect should be able to see what is priority here. just saying.....
12-Jun-13 22:05:24
I was wondering the same thing Mr c
Whispermyname
12-Jun-13 22:06:02
Very well said Juicy
Aussie_Couple
12-Jun-13 22:07:05
and here I thought people posting fakes pics
was turning people off coming here...

Mr A_C
12-Jun-13 22:08:01
maybe I don't like when people attack some one...
MieleGattina-OLD
12-Jun-13 22:10:44
I have to jump in again...she knows EXACTLY what she is doing, and she knows that she is upsetting the majority here...it is shown by everyone who has posted on this blog. Most people are disturbed by her behavior, it isn't just a select few. People who've never taken issue to anyone publicly are doing so here. Why? I'm not sure...maybe they have children and seeing the way men react to her makes them think of their own...or, maybe they've been victims in the past and this brings back horrible memories for them. Just like Juicy said, xxxx fantasies are not condoned here because they glamorize an illegal act...xxxxxxxxxx should be treated the same. And, before anything is said...the nuances matter. Of course, it is fine for couples to post in a way that suggests domination, but they can't act like rapists on status...not only are the photos childlike, her mannerisms and "speech" are childlike...where do we draw the line? Or, should we just let everyone post what they want and just suggest half the site block the other half?
12-Jun-13 22:26:09
mg are you telling me you don't think the mocking her and word for word copies of her status updates did not maker the issue worse then it was?
12-Jun-13 22:26:29
to everyone on here who wants to, just block her and move on. if you dont like someone ignore them i do to most of you.
MieleGattina-OLD
12-Jun-13 22:28:08
Toy, no, I don't think that's right...and you know better than anyone that I will jump in and defend someone I truly believe is being bullied needlessly...I've made lots of enemies that way. But, the people who have posted here have a valid point. I tried overlooking it, and have done so pretty successfully...but some things had to be said in an objective way.
12-Jun-13 22:33:55
Personally, if she is NOT breaking rules, (yes I agree the act is well beyond disturbing, and so she she is blocked) ,.. then really, removing her is wrong.. however, if the 'block'feature was better where you could block seeing their blogs, photos, profile, comments,.. etc, making it to where they basically do NOT exist then those who are bothered by it won't have to deal with it, and NN can't be called out on removing someone who 'technically' did nothing wrong. There is childish behavior here on both sides, her act, and those who feel its okay to pick at her, make fun of her, rerun her status etc. Just my opinion on this.
Aussie_Couple
12-Jun-13 22:39:03
If bunny isn't breaking the nn rules, let it be, I've seen older adults carry on like children in here,
and yet they should know better...

Mr A_C
Aussie_Couple
12-Jun-13 22:40:09
Well said HP... Mr A_C
12-Jun-13 23:01:31
Again, the age matter was just a side question. The biggest matter and the most important one is: Simulating, promoting and catering to an illegal act. The nature of it all is considered just as bad as real Kp. Simulation of an act that is questionable can get others into trouble and even investigated. This is my concern for the site and I made this clear when said poster showed up in December. I made it perfectly clear! My initial concern was for NN, no one else. As a person who has knowledge in this field, I will not sit by now that NN has approached the discussion.

Even a new member such as Sarah, who has not been around here for long has noticed the offensive nature and how it is being promoted. So no one can say that she is out to get anyone or has an agenda. Thank you Sarah.

This is not about jealousy and it never has been. Yes, you can block her. BUT the seemingly disgusting nature and simulated KP act remains and can possibly harm NN.

Juicy is absolutely correct in what she posts. Ju has been here since the inception of NN and she usually agrees and promotes NN all of the time. This time her words are for the good of the site and what could possibly happen to this site.
12-Jun-13 23:08:05
You know, some people are genuinely quite sweet and innocent by nature. Even in this modern, twisted world, there are a few people that genuinely are bubbly and and talk like Bunnylovescake does. She's just being herself and if that's different to how other people behave, it doesn't mean she's wrong to do that.

There's a good 20 or 30 years age difference between her and a lot of the members that don't like the way she acts.

I've seen people on here blatantly stating things on here about her that were completely unnecessary and very hurtful. It basically was bullying. I know what bullying looks and feels like because I was bullied when I was young by a number of different groups and for a few years. I have actually commented via a status at some point about what I have observed.

I like this website, I like lots of the members but sometimes things that I see I don't like. Sometimes what I observe looks like a witch hunt.

I'm not going to comment on this thread again, it doesn't really matter what I think and it won't change anyones opinion. I'm not going to get into any arguments about anything I've written.

Live and let live.
State_of_Shock
12-Jun-13 23:12:18
She makes me laugh because what she says sounds like something out of rainbow-dream-dog Anime cartoon. It's just that it makes me feel slightly uncomfertable because it's impossible to have a conversation with her without cakes or ballons getting in the way. Just a bit odd but yeah I guess I am a bit odd as well and I'll be honest as far as issues goes I have more issues with other members.
Bunnylovescake
12-Jun-13 23:19:22
Everything I say I like is true I love rainbows and I have lots of Barbies and collect them and I love to bake, and when people want to talk naughty with me I do. I know though I sometimes say Bunny says because its fun and a habit of mine but I dont always say that. :)
Bunnylovescake
12-Jun-13 23:25:21
Hi Miele, I think I do get bullied , and mocked and I don't see how you can disagree with that.
I just like being playful with people, and nice. And I think I deserve the same rights as others on here, who can wear outfits even school girl ones and who wear pony tails also, and tutus and have stuffed animals but who are 45 and thats okay but when I do it because of how I look it isn't okay. And thats not fair.
Bunnylovescake
12-Jun-13 23:43:28
And I dont think saying you will bake someone a sugar cookie that looks like Barbie, or sometimes saying your username or nickname in a 3rd person kind of way is bad compared to someone calling people mean names and mocking them. Lots of things can remind people of bad experiences, example would be gang bang pics for example. But should that also not be allowed? I think as long as Im not being mean to anybody and as long as I am of legal age and not saying anything that isnt true that it shouldnt be a problem. The only thing I do is sometimes say my nickname Bunny in the 3rd person.
Northern Star
12-Jun-13 23:46:10
I guess the bottom line is..NN is aware..NN is on it..NN will keep watch..you can all rest easy and continue to block Bunny if ya wish..life goes on..
Aussie_Couple
12-Jun-13 23:48:09
Nn should be worried about the bullies and the childish acts of the older members on here instead of making a big issues out of someone that doesn't cause harm and not mocking others...

Mr A_C
12-Jun-13 23:50:22
i am one of your mods i have blocked her my 13 year old doesnt talk like that and sorry i dont want to read it its not funny
12-Jun-13 23:54:40
"The only thing I do is sometimes say my nickname Bunny in the 3rd person." and constantly act like an 8 year old.
13-Jun-13 0:07:38
There Is a difference between acting immature and acting child like. Think about it like the difference between a metaphor and a simile.
13-Jun-13 0:09:16
The most harm I've seen bunny do.. Is give someone a sugar overload :/

What I actually find more disturbing than anything .. Are men (and women for that matter) who are sexually attracted to preadolescence.
Bunnylovescake
13-Jun-13 0:28:18
@SarahAnn I am unexperienced in a sexual way. That is not lying it's the truth. And I dont boast of how innocent I am or anything. Like I said I only sometimes speak in the 3rd person.
Bunnylovescake
13-Jun-13 0:33:53
But this is the last thing I can say because I dont like arguments I dont dress in anyway that other NNers havent or do not dress like and don't get scolded for. I only make references to cartoons/ Barbie and others can make references to them too and it's okay for them to. And I sometimes use my nickname when I say things like Bunny loves cake. Wich I don't think is that big of a deal compared to things others say. x
MissLizzie
13-Jun-13 0:41:25
I've never questioned her age, she is obviously an adult, but I feel like she is promoting xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, and that looks bad on the site.
Whispermyname
13-Jun-13 1:37:00
Just one more thing here if I may...I don't see anywhere here that anybody wants Bunny to be deleted...they just want the baby talk to stop on an adult site is that what I see? Because I think she definitely has the look for the site but on status no place for that talk. So I'm 63 rd comment on this blog and I don't think anything will be resolved ...can do without the politics...too much real life drama.
13-Jun-13 2:44:13
If she's not tripping on something, then she's in real trouble!
13-Jun-13 4:44:39
Dani92 looks likke Bunny with make up on......lol.
antiderivative
13-Jun-13 4:52:13
Dani92 looks like a faker to me :)
Bustymisty
13-Jun-13 12:32:14
All I know is that in the chat room Tuesday night she kept pimping her own pics of herself and her stuffed animals. It made everyone in the room uncomfortable. That, along with her talking about her Barbie cakes and unicorn stuffed animals. It was totally ridiculous.
13-Jun-13 13:49:25
Bunny's comments on this blog are the most intelligent and articulate writings I've seen from her to date proving she CAN express herself as an adult.
13-Jun-13 14:28:36
His_Princess, I couldn't agree more, which just goes to prove that her behaviour in status IS an act, which really does need to stop, or be toned down a lot.
14-Jun-13 3:17:28
I thought this was supposed to be taken care of? She has not cut back, toned down or anything of the sort. Her statuses tonight just continue to prove this.
14-Jun-13 6:25:24
NN, I took her off block and yes, she has not cut back one iota and as a matter of fact, it has escalated. She has appeared to have scoffed it off as if she has been given carte blanche.

Sorry Peeps, but she hasn't. It shows a disregard for what NN has asked of her. Basically she has turned her nose up and won't abide by NN's wishes.
Research Candidate
14-Jun-13 9:35:02
Well if it is the case that nothing has changed despite NN's request, surely that gives moderators every right to delete her statuses until she does.
14-Jun-13 14:42:57
no it does not, if she is not breaking the rules, or causing an actual disturbance then it does not merit deletion. Also at the time people posted that she had not stopped, she had only 4 updates in the 3-4 hours before. yes she is doing the @xxx, and giving out cupcakes, but that is not disruptive, and is actually a very common way to behave on chat and message boards...
Research Candidate
14-Jun-13 15:05:40
Yes it is a very common way for people to behave on chat and message boards...if you are under 10 years old!
14-Jun-13 15:17:30
when someone in status says they need coffee, typically someone will reply "here" or " grab a cup" something like that. how is that any different?
Research Candidate
14-Jun-13 15:34:48
Okay toy, lets talk facts: At the moment there are 104 comments on this blog. Excluding Bunnylovescake and NN, those comments have been submitted by 32 people. Of those 32 people 2 have not commented one way or the other, 6 including yourself, cannot see anything wrong and the remaining 24 find her behaviour on here disturbing, uncomfortable or worse. If that does not say something to you, I don't know what will, but I know one thing and that is, I've never yet seen you admit you are wrong, about anything.
14-Jun-13 16:05:21
and I doubt you would admit it if you did. but numbers don't really count with this since many who also feel there is nothing wrong won't say any thing for fear of attack.
Research Candidate
14-Jun-13 16:28:11
That's a cop out if ever I heard one. Numbers give a good representation of how people feel. That is how people vote in presidents and prime ministers. It is even used to ascertain how many people watch a television programme to see whether it will be a success or a flop. It is no different here to anywhere else.

For your information, I'm one of the first people to put my hand up and admit I'm wrong.

Also for your information, when I worked for a large company in the IT department, I had to raise the alarm over certain things I saw on employees computers.

To reiterate:

75% say disturbing, uncomfortable or worse
18.75% say nothing wrong
6.25% abstentions
LakeFX
14-Jun-13 17:10:55
I just wish that the 'act' (as others put it) would end as well. I just feel it invites predators, but that's my issue ... & for her sake, I hope not hers! I much rather chat with her about movies, like Lost Boys as we did in status the other day than the latter. Thanks for posting this NN.
MrCoverYou
14-Jun-13 18:19:27
Yes, toy and many who view this whole thing as a disturbing train wreck will keep their mouths shut as well because, at this point, it is evident, that your opinion seems to carry a hell of a lot more weight than at least 25 other intelligent, articulate members.
14-Jun-13 18:37:02
Toy, the comment I made about her not toning it down was solely in reference to the way she speaks like a child. As a father who has 2 children under the age of 6, I hear talk like "she is a smart little girl kittie". That is not the way MOST grown women of 19 years of age speak. Honestly, I have conditioned myself to ignore most of her statuses, because they do no harm. If something annoys me I do not pay attention to it. I admit that I was not paying attention to her statuses and properly addressing the situations, and I accept that. I am also one of the people who will admit being wrong. I should not have been ignoring her statuses, because I am a mod. But I do feel that the way in which she chooses to speak does have the potential to draw people who persue these illegal xxxxxxxx activities. We do not condone acts like this in the chat rooms or in the pic galleries, but why is it permissible in status? We talk about her not breaking any rules, but even when someone hints at things like this in other areas of the site they get disciplinary action taken against them right away. All I am saying is that it should be consistent everywhere on the site. And as was mentioned by several members I have spoken to, and like TWL said, many feel that Bunny has a Carte Blanche to do whatever she wants. With so many people voicing their issues here and nothing being done, it gives the rest of the users the impression that NOTHING will be done about this, so why should they voice their grievances?
Rebel_Rebel
14-Jun-13 18:37:06
How did you get proof of her age? And where are her verification pics?
And if she is so happy, why doesn't she ever smile in her photo's?
14-Jun-13 19:00:54
rebel I am quite happy myself, and yet in many of my pictures I do not smile, how is smiling or not for a photo indication of anything? and rock, you prove my point by mentioning that her behavior invites a certain element, and others who have for months insinuated anyone who talks to her is a pedophile, or those who say her pictures are perpetuating xxxxxxxxxx, those are the reasons why many wont speak up, if they do they get that stigma because they are 10 20 30 40 50 years older then her. So what if she talks about how smart her cat is, so what is she offers candy and cakes to the many and I do mean many people who talk to her on status, so what if she has balloons, stuffed animals and toys as props, hell I do to and have since I first joined at age 18... Yes many people do not like or care for the way she behaves but just as many feel the same way about many others here who do not get asked to show proof of who they are to the owner as a way to quell the complaints of others. and as iam2 said how is her behavior and pictures worse then a member who post pictures and talks about getting pissed on and drinking urine? and one finally thing the loudest voice does not mean anything more then your loud....
redvs4u
14-Jun-13 19:22:41
Wow.....that comment of Rebels was in no way directed to you,Toy. Slow down and really see what people are saying.
14-Jun-13 19:37:26
I do see what people are saying, and I see how the attacks on bunny have actually fluctuated and changed. when she first joined she was called a fake and a cam girl, a liar for saying she was a virgin, then it moved to she is annoying with the 3rd person talk, then it moved to the whole she is acting like a child and drawing in a bad element. I have seen how a small group of people calling 24 hour a day attention to her and the way she talks , by mocking her in status, and blogging about her drew even more attention to her causing the few to grow and grow until we ended up with this mess we have now. I see that there are more people who talk to her on status on a daily basis then there are who talk about her and how she acts. I see more then you realize red... and MrC. so you and anyone else who wants to think I have any sway around here understand how fucking stupid of a statement that it is, If I had sway do you think that half of those who try and start shit with me on a daily basis would still be here? seriously if I had power over things dont you think I would use it to get rid of the people who have trolled me since I first joined? get over the bullshit and stop trying to spread a rumor that you know full well is baseless....
Research Candidate
14-Jun-13 19:46:49
Is this the same person who wanted to put a load of rubber ducks in a pond with her newbienude name on so that people would find you on here, an not worry about the consequences of young children finding those rubber ducks? I see a lot and remember a lot too. You are right, the loudest voice is just that, the loudest voice, but a lot of people on here are not loud but articulate intelligent folk who have a wealth of experience over you. Many of the people commenting on here are between 40 and 50 and are not as short sighted as you.
redvs4u
14-Jun-13 19:57:14
First of all Toy, you missed my point completely and made this about yourself. I was merely pointing out the fact that Rebel's comment was directed toward Bunny, not you. And as for thinking you have "power" around here.....I have never given you that much credit nor would I imagine that having "power" around here would actually amount to a hill of beans. And I have never thought her to be fake, I take issue with the childish behavior only. The other annoying acts of hers I can easily ignore, just as I ignore the annoying behaviors of others on here. And not sure what "baseless rumor" you are talking about.
14-Jun-13 20:08:21
red... my past comment first post was in response to you... and my point is just because someone does not smile in pictures has nothing to do with them being happy... you are not part of the group of people I was referring to as the ones who attacked her from day one, under littlecandybunny
14-Jun-13 20:34:13
Has everyone forgotten the night lilcandybunny, then bella and now Bunnylove cake was in status when she first got here? She was told to take down her web crap pics and post verification pics. It was obvious that she was posting on web sites in other places or why else would a Mod tell her to take down her web crap pics so she could get verified. I remember that night, so do alot of the other members.
14-Jun-13 20:43:57
guitar I have no idea when she was told to take her web crap down as you put it, but what I do remember is, on status NN was informed by myself and LMBG that we thought she might have faked the her verification shots, as we had both seen her pictures her before and removed them before because we thought they were suspicious. she already had verification shots that NN then removed and requested new ones that she submitted and he for a second time verified her...
MrCoverYou
14-Jun-13 21:14:53
Head...meet wall. Head...meet wall. Head...
Research Candidate
14-Jun-13 21:29:32
One thing I've come to realize is this. As I said earlier, 75% are in agreement that the "act" is wrong. Here we have 24 out of 32 making up that 75%. However, I have a feeling that even if it was 240 out of 320 which is still 75%, the 75% would still be wrong in toy's eyes.
14-Jun-13 21:31:28
There is a huge difference in perception between someone saying "hands you a cup of coffee" vs "hands you a unicorn sugar cookie with pink icing and sprinkles."
bettysswollocks
14-Jun-13 21:54:19
There really are none so blind as those that cannot see. Unsurprisingly I do have a lot more to say than that, but it's better if I don't and, quite frankly, it's already been said by the 75% over and over and over....

I guess it's time for NN to step in here and decide what he thinks is best for his site. I really hope he's been taking notes.
14-Jun-13 21:58:02
his princess, I personally disagree...
MrCoverYou
14-Jun-13 22:05:01
Numbers don't lie and are not, in any way, subjective.
Aussie_Couple
14-Jun-13 22:17:26
I guess showing her I'd to nn doesn't lie either..
MrCoverYou
14-Jun-13 22:20:10
Nor does the fact that you have also COMPLETELY missed the point.
Aussie_Couple
14-Jun-13 22:38:27
Nn ask for her Id and asked bunny to toned it down in status.. I'm sure nn will keep a close eye on it like he does with a few others very closely on here..

Mr ac
Rebel_Rebel
15-Jun-13 3:13:07
Actually, my comment was directed to NN.
I was truly curious, how do they get proof of age via a website?
How do you prove that the person in the photo's is the same person who is running the profile? Unless you personally spoke to her via webcam?
I haven't been here long and in all honesty, when I first saw her profile, I thought it was a baiting one.
I'm not being nasty, I am just sharing what thoughts I had as a new member.
Rebel_Rebel
15-Jun-13 3:15:01
By the way NN. In profiles, the part where members "describe" themselves, were you aware "Tattoo" is spelt incorrectly? :)
mrSchowitall
15-Jun-13 4:46:42
I've got photos with my Blue Walrus bath toy , rubber duck and boat. And I'm 35.
15-Jun-13 14:41:53
Guys this is getting out of hand. I just read bunnies last few status updates and there was nothing I could see problematic. She has toned it down as far as I can see.

Still there seems much unrest on this topic..

SO...

I will make a rule to apply to this situation, but you guys write the rule.

Define exactly what she is doing wrong, agree on it in here, and I will make it a rule that bunny and all else have to abide by.

From my point of view complaints about speaking in the 3rd person have no basis. Complaints about speaking about cupcakes or balloons likewise have no basis.

So - define what it is you don't want her doing, all agree to it and a rule it will become.
Rebel_Rebel
15-Jun-13 15:00:15
Maybe you should just make the site 21+ only?
15-Jun-13 15:06:03
NN I can understand wanting to put an end to this I just hope you also consider that the @so and so is also really not a big deal as I said before it is a common way to respond to a specific person in chat rooms and message boards and has been so for a lot longer then this site has been around...
15-Jun-13 15:12:15
The majority thought the world was flat for a very long time. Were they right?
15-Jun-13 15:32:30
Toy, I don't believe anyone has made mention that "@so and so" is their issue.

NN - if it was JUST *hands you a cupcake" it probably wouldn't be an issue either. Reading thru the comments, it appears it's the little girl talk and the rainbows, sprinkles, teddy bears, unicorns, glitter, etc., ad nauseum that's bothering folks.
MieleGattina-OLD
15-Jun-13 15:38:48
NN, I will PM you my thoughts...
Research Candidate
15-Jun-13 16:02:44
I cannot believe my eyes, NN cannot see anything wrong with her behaviour despite 25 people on here who can. Now in the Bunny blog she is even recommending people to go premium to avoid seeing her childish behaviour. Have you even read all the comments in here NN or do you prefer to take the view of one single moderator who happens to be around the same age as the one exhibiting childish behaviour. Do you listen to the other moderators here who have themselves said they see an issue here. Is toy the chief moderator on this site? Many of us have been asking that question for a long time.
Research Candidate
15-Jun-13 16:08:14
Incidentally, if it has got out of hand, it has done so simply because you have let it get that way, by not nipping the root cause of the problem in the bud when it first arose.
15-Jun-13 17:35:27
sidders... very true...
MrCoverYou
15-Jun-13 18:09:35
Sidders, welcome to the Missed the Point Club.
15-Jun-13 18:18:10
I wash my hands of this entire ordeal. I dare say that this can only get worse for the site. The warning signs are there and if they are chosen to be ignored, then that is on the heads of those who walk on by. There was proof in the beginning that this would be problematic and a blind eye was turned. I made my views known on a professional level. But not on a personal level my views are this: The person in the middle of this has brought an air of filth to this site. If you don't like what I just wrote....who the hell cares. And yes, I was one of the members in status when it was brought up the she was at one time posting web crap. So this innocent bit is lost on me.
15-Jun-13 18:38:58
Wait.. I changed my mind. NN if you insist on letting 18 year old members in, then do the site a favor and make a barely legal section. You made a separate section for others, then why not a barely legal section? This way the majority of adults are not subjected to the similarities of kiddie porn. We have the ability to block the words of a childish person, but we do not have the ability to block the images. It is something to think about. It is a win win situation. The men who are drawn to pre pubescent girls and boys would feel comfortable commenting without being judged and the pre pubescent posters can go on pretending to be under age. It is something to think.
SarahAnn69
15-Jun-13 19:00:25
TWL's separate site idea for girls that look or behave xxxxxxxx MAY work.

But if we're writing a rule, it should be something about having to behave as a believable adult.

I don't know any adults who would giggle and hand out pink frosted unicorn cookies with pretty sprinkles... without being punched in the face. This could also cover other issues of people having temper tantrums so mods can quickly clean up BS.
15-Jun-13 19:11:19
twl, honestly I have no issues with you personally, and you know I feel we can have different opinions about thing. BUT, throwing around words like kiddie porn and xxxxxxxxxx like many have over this subject does not help. there is a category for young adults 18+, which I believe was something else at one point. and You may have a good point with magazines like Cherry, barely legal, just 18, under21 and ect... being so popular, and there being many barely legal style of sites that actually make quite a lot of money, maybe a barely legal site for the network should be an idea. However do not forget that does not mean that if someone is just 18 or barely legal that they should only be on that site, after all we do not say all TG have to go to the transgender site, all gays and lesbians have to go to the gay and lesbian site... also to me, the last part of statement makes no sense, if NN can come under fire for allowing it here how does making a separate site not do the same?
15-Jun-13 19:20:01
and Sarah, have you ever gone to a Comic game or anime convention? or even a game store that sells yugioh or other such games? I do and at the one we go to every week there is a girl 19 years old that wears a kitty cap with long flaps that end in fingerless gloves. She also always has her face painted with whiskers when she wear the hat. Last time she was there she brought over 100 homemade cookies frosted like the 5 elements from magic the gathering, handed them out to anyone she talked to and played against that night. Was it a trick to get people to drop their guard so she could have an upper hand? maybe. and is bunnys act a trick to get more attention here? maybe. but it does happen in real life too, even if you have not seen it.
15-Jun-13 19:23:13
In the UK a person is considered to be an adult at 18 and not 21. It is legal for 16 year olds to have sex.

The fashion seems to be for people of all ages, particularly women to shave off their pubic hair. There are women of all ages that have small breasts, just as there are men with small penis', they can't help that, it's the way they were born. For those reasons, I believe that the pre pubescent comment is a bit harsh.

I know girls well in to their twenties that act and talk quite girly, it's just the way they are.

Marilyn Monroe made an entire career from behaving particularly girly and that was seemingly acceptable.

I personally find women of all ages, shapes and colours attractive. I am not attracted to children, nor do I think that Bunnylovescake is a child.

She is being herself, she shouldn't be persecuted for being that person. Surely, it is more disturbing that there are people out there that dress as adult babies or that enjoy degrading each other.

I have always thought this, was on the whole, a place full of open minded people that accepted others for who they are. Now, I'm not so sure.

I know that there are people that will read what I've written and disagree, that's your prerogative. Having differing opinions is part of what makes us human.

If your opinion differs to mine, please don't launch in to an attack on me, I won't bite because quite frankly, I can't be bothered.

All I ask is that you cut the girl some slack and leave her alone.
Bunnylovescake
15-Jun-13 22:55:17
I am just being myself when I talk about my likes and cake and I love the people on NN, and think this is a great site to express yourself as long as you are not causing harm to anyone verbally, or doing anything illegal. Which I do not believe I am doing either. Instead of trying to tell people what they should be allowed to wear or what words they are allowed to say, if someone bothers you , then block them or filter your pics. Nobody is forcing you to look at or read what anybody has to say. If someone doesn't want to block or filter then it's their own fault, and if anything it would encourage more people to become premium. I do not intend to offend anybody I just like being who I am and that is a girl who likes wearing pretty and cute things and bake and be nice. -Bunny
Bunnylovescake
15-Jun-13 23:00:09
@LakeFX I am not acting, I am just expressing who I am when I say I like to bake or like rainbows and Barbie, and like to be playful with others in that way , I also am honest when I say I am a virgin why shouldn't I be allowed to like what I do? I am not saying I am an xxxxxxxx girl who wants to have sex with a daddy.
15-Jun-13 23:02:01
I disagree with the idea of buying premium just to block someone. but yeah block the things you don't want to see...
Bunnylovescake
15-Jun-13 23:02:25
@rockhard I use to post a status like 10-15 times a day, now I only post like 3 times a day. When I explain what is happening in my picture I use the name "Bunny and what I am doing in it" I am talking about food in my status, and who says you have to be a child to like Barbie? Or like to bake cakes that are colorful or involve characters? Ever watch Ace of Cakes on the food network channel? Or know that Paris Hilton and Nicki Minaj (singer) both are obsessed with Barbie and are grown women older than me?
Bunnylovescake
15-Jun-13 23:08:07
@Rebel Rebel I made a video for NN personally holding my ID which looked like me and had my birth date on it, plus a picture of me holding my ID. He knows I am 19 years old.
Bunnylovescake
15-Jun-13 23:11:26
I am not trying to make anyone think I am a xxxxxxxx girl. I am just trying to be myself and what I like may be similar to what others younger than me like, but it does not mean that someone 19 or older cannot also like them. I have a friend name Matt and he is 30 and likes My little pony, they call those guys Bronnies.
15-Jun-13 23:48:15
My request stands. Write a rule about this issue in terms of what is acceptable behavior, agree on it and I will make it so.

TWL to liken this to KP is unacceptable.
16-Jun-13 7:41:16
NN, I am not the only member who has made that statement in reference to KP. Please do not single me out as the only one doing so. I have already made my statement that I wash my hands of this entire fiasco. I did what I was supposed to do as a concerned member of this site. Sorry for looking out for your best interest. I will not do it again. From now on, I will not report any web trash, because obviously you allow it with some members. I will not report the free loaders who have been here for years and not once paid for premium, but yet they advertise their own business in their profiles. My time here will be spent doing my own thing and just letting it all slide by.
16-Jun-13 8:07:32
Just an observation but several others mentioned the dreaded "KP" in these blog comments before twl. Also several times through the comments I seen the entire phrase of "CP".Prominent members including the ever dutiful masterstoy... and I also seen members rock and sarahann as well as juicy mention it as well. A quick read (well not so quick) shows that. Just my 2 cents NN.
Research Candidate
16-Jun-13 10:09:57
You're right guitartxn, it is not fair to single one person out when others have said the same thing. On another note what does "toning down" mean. My interpretation of it is that toning down does not mean reduce the number of statuses but still chat like a baby on those that are still posted; it means by all means, carry on posting statuses, albeit as long as you are not spamming the page, but dont act a baby on any of them.
MrCoverYou
16-Jun-13 14:18:15
Agreed. Singling Tight out was ridiculous and unfair. She was not the first person to bring it up. With this, I'm taking my leave of this thread of comments. The ignorance and apathy has become a bit (read: WAY) too much to bear.
Bunnylovescake
16-Jun-13 14:28:16
As for toning it down, I do not speak like a baby on status, I sometimes maention food. But I have not written a status saying " Bunny says this" maybe in describing things, but I have only talked about food references, as many others on NN do, and telling people that I wish for them to have a nice day. I also have tried to as I told NN keep myself more on a lower profile by not statusing a real lot, so that I do not bring extra attention to myself.
Bunnylovescake
16-Jun-13 14:45:06
As for Tight_Wet_Lips who has harassed me from day 1 on here, in ways that have nothing to do with my photos as well such as in my blogs etc. I am not posting kiddie porn since I am of legal age. You can say people are promoting whatever you like, such as stripper outfits promoting prostitution, or gang bang promoting xxxx, so should that also not be allowed because some people percieve it as such? But it is allowed because they are not professing to be prostitutes, and they are not professing to be victims of xxxx. Just as how I am not professing to be an xxxxxxxx girl, and have shown that I am of legal age.
And Im not the first one to mention food, wear tutus, incorporate stuffed animals etc and I don't see speaking in third person to describe yourself sometimes exclusively promote xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. And with all the things people say to harm eachother on here, such as name calling, and mocking I think that is far worse, and deserves the special attention.
And that's all I'm gonna say.

-Bunny
PoeticLicense
16-Jun-13 17:13:30
I feel if it's way out of line (like talk of xxxxxx, violating animals, and feces) then it should go. But, really, is this any different than men wanting women to diaper them? Men or women wanting someone to spank them because they've been "vewwy vewwy naughty"? If NN has set forth the criteria to Bunny then let it work it's magic. Try to be part of the solution.
LakeFX
19-Jun-13 6:54:44
your comment "sex with a daddy" came out of your mind, not mine... I've never said that ANYWHERE about you. If it's not an act as you say, you'd think there would be some kind of an expression. Be it smiling, sad, angry, something.
LakeFX
19-Jun-13 7:31:06
the fact alone that you projected "sex with daddy" shows were you are at mentally. It's not hard to see why people would be concerned about your behavior when you present yourself as you do. You can't even tell that people are thinking of your safety & those attacking you.
LakeFX
19-Jun-13 7:32:02
where* ... my bad
LakeFX
19-Jun-13 7:36:18
Write a rule about this issue in terms of what is acceptable behavior, agree on it and I will make it so.... How about when the vast majority of people who have been members/ recent members for a long time are concerned? Let's make it at least 10 people so you don't think they're just "ganging up" on the user. Then you ( NN ) reviews the issue & makes a decision to say something to said user.
19-Jun-13 12:32:56
lake, 10 people is less then 1% of 1%... hardly a large portion of people
LakeFX
20-Jun-13 9:23:07
you pick a number than Toy, whatever floats your boat... will that be better than? What sounds good, a couple thousand, million ... you pick than. At least I'm suggesting something, how about you?
20-Jun-13 13:31:23
I have no intent on making suggestions for a rule that I do not think needs made. I will give my opinion on any suggestion others make.
LakeFX
20-Jun-13 14:59:25
o if you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem... right? I still think ten is PERFECT! Nowhere did he (NN) say he wanted a majority, only agree on a rule. It's obvious (to me at least) that you'll never agree on any suggestion, especially after your last comment. That's why he should review the grievances & make his own decision. I still think the person tries to push the envelope & when others call it out all of a sudden the persons status or the comment disappears (only leaving them with evidence IF they took a screenshot).
20-Jun-13 15:18:01
making a rule that says a certain number of people can cause nn or support to do something, is asinine at best. especially when it is such a low number. take this as an example there are over 30 people who have complained about, so yeah your idea of only 10 people, would only guaranty what you want...
20-Jun-13 15:24:17
ooh and a far as nn reviewing grievances, he did, and if you read the actual blog he made his decision. it is all those who did not like what he said that madder him then say to cooked up with a rule. I am someone who was fine with what he said to begin with, so why should or would I make suggestions for a new rule that I don't think is needed.
LakeFX
20-Jun-13 16:36:14
Well if you read his comment under his blog (up above) you'd see what we're still talking about. As for you, I don't care what you do Toy, keep trying to change the argument (be it numbers, you just wanting to say you think there's nothing wrong, whatever) ... this issue will keep coming back up every time said user keeps up with their act.
20-Jun-13 16:47:23
seriously he made a decision, the bitching continued because it was not one that people liked. which is typical around here...
LakeFX
20-Jun-13 16:56:43
He (NN) did not, if so then why is he now asking for a rule to be made? Exactly, it's not dealt with (FULLY) just yet. Maybe you should stop bitching & let him respond to this request that HE made.
20-Jun-13 17:14:13
read the blog... he said she may not be everyone's cup of tea, but she is allowed to be here... what he asked was in response to all the bitching that followed... and if you want to see it as something different so be it. but I continue to disagree with your idea...
LakeFX
20-Jun-13 17:16:18
read the comments to his blog!
LakeFX
20-Jun-13 17:17:38
here, I'll cut & paste his (NN) own comment to his blog .... "My request stands. Write a rule about this issue in terms of what is acceptable behavior, agree on it and I will make it so. "
20-Jun-13 17:32:51
you are choosing to ignore his blog... I'm done responding to you about this. have fun...
LakeFX
20-Jun-13 17:37:54
You are choosing to ignore his (NN) comment to his(NN) own blog. Do what you will, I know I will as well.
MrCoverYou
20-Jun-13 22:24:50
Spot on, Lake. Too bad good sense and simple logic seem to have no place in this discussion.
21-Jun-13 0:04:29
Masterstoy It's clear as can be that NN hasn't resolved this yet, the comment says it all. If he had made the decision he wouldn't be asking us to agree on a rule. "read the blog." Read the comments! Just admit you're wrong and move on.

As for the whole situation, if Bunny spoke like she does in these comments, on the rest of the site there wouldn't be a problem. But the constant "Gives you a unicorn shaped cupcake with rainbow coloured icing" is far too much. It was mentioned before it's no different to "Gives X a coffee" It's completely different, and people don't do that all the time.
21-Jun-13 0:07:25
There is a huge difference in perception between someone saying "hands you a cup of coffee" vs "hands you a unicorn sugar cookie with pink icing and sprinkles."

^^^^
This.
21-Jun-13 18:31:04
Yes I have kept quiet about this for ages but,,, Enough is Enough. Yes I am a mod - I flit from status to chat rooms - I was a little concerned at the statuses but blocking is a wonderful thing for some people - I feel sorry when someone can't block enough people unless they unblock someone else. I went to the chat rooms to get away from the childish act/persona - call it what ya want to. Adult chat is what I want & kiddiespeak is what I see. Plenty of ADULTS complain to me in chat rooms about this - WHAT can I do except tell them to send in a ticket or pm NN. As a mod my hands are tied - nowt I can do about it :(:( ... So anyone that has complained to me and asked me to do something PLEASE tell NN or Support (and hopes that support will answer you).
legoman3
7-Jul-13 14:36:40
I've got no time for this kind of act. But I won't stress about it. If it was illegal, NN would take a different view. At least "Bunny" does a good job exposing the credulous.

I think if she came back as lilcandidbunny she could do well here..

Don't we all love a controversy? :]
Temujin_Khan
8-Aug-13 2:38:48
Wow...I think TWL said it all
19-Aug-13 2:47:01
I think people should be required to act like an adult on an adult site.
That's all.. that's the rule it's so simple. ... but it's not because someone will say define adult behavior, that's what happens.
It really boils down to a free speech issue.. but at the same time its about people not being comfortable reading it.. requiring members to be 21 would help tone it down,maybe.. but if bunnylovescake likes to be nice it should be no problem for her to act like an adult like she has in this blog. We try to be nice to everyone.. but it makes us leave status and find something else to do.. because it's such juvenile behavior it's almost shocking to read on an adult site.. our opinion.
so we are with the it kinda bugs us crowd.
Help / Contact | Rules |  Terms of use / disclaimer | webmasters | Epoch Billing Support | Privacy Policy | DMCA / Takedown Request
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement
Page generated in 0.44 seconds